![red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung](http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_02_2009/post-4508-1235012815.jpg)
- #Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung how to
- #Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung manual
- #Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung full
Gnevin ( talk) 22:39, (UTC) Reply So MOS:DAB, and Category:Science (Manual of Style) are also going to be removed, seeing as they are project specific? I personally oppose, as this is the first step backwards in unleashing a clusterfuck of vandalism to which we couldn't respond with a part of the MOS. I'm not sure I understand the rest of what your saying. Removing this from the MoS doesn't affect Featured Content noms, FA noms should still comply with this guideline. Imzadi 1979 → 22:32, (UTC) Reply The analog is Category:Style guidelines of WikiProjects and this guideline still takes its cue from the MoS. Now they're floating out there without the primacy of the MoS stamp to guide their enforcement on "our finest work". Imzadi 1979 → 22:18, (UTC) Reply Yes they have been removed Gnevin ( talk) 22:24, (UTC) Reply Is there going to be an analog to the MoS for a content-specific style guide, a central location for editors to locate content-specific guidelines for the dissemination of content? The advantage to being a part of the MoS is that compliance with these types of style guides was required for Featured Content nominations. Imzadi 1979 → 21:48, (UTC) Reply Yes a wide range of articles but all part of WP:ROADS and as such is a project guideline Gnevin ( talk) 22:07, (UTC) Reply Are all subject-matter style guidelines being similarly proposed for removal? If not, then this one should not as well. As such, it is the past consensus that it remain a part of the MoS. Removing from the MoS doesn't not affect how this project uses this guideline Gnevin ( talk) 19:51, (UTC) Reply This covers a wide range of articles on a global scale. Why should this be part of the MoS which is meant to deal with issues covering large numbers of topics and areas. This is a project guideline is every sense of the word.
![red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung](https://www.unionmilitaria.com/images/201610/source_img/690_P_1476855087426.jpg)
72 Typographical Quotation Marks Made Hard.70 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Naming conventions for United States federal buildings.69 Could we have a guideline on pronunciation placement?.68 Titles of people (Mr, Mrs, Miss but most importantly for me M).66 Consecutive "end of sentence" marks?.
#Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung full
![red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung](http://www.animalkaiser.com/uk/cards/ver3/img/leaflet_front.jpg)
62 Use of various synonyms for the same item in an article.58 Layout on weights and measures in Mosnum.53 DocumentHistory template-do we need to rethink?.50 Articles ("The and A") in section headings.49 Long s in quotations from primary sources.48 Etymology format needs standardizing.47 Revert to "Animals, plants, and other organisms".45 Replacing of HTML markup for dashes with Unicode characters.42 Back to zany em dashes for Canadian ridings.40 Why isn't this is alphabetical order?.37 Category:Lists of popular pages by WikiProject.33 Foreign terms: could we get a warning about not throwing around "literally" like it's a synonym for "can be roughly translated as"?.32.1 Arbitrary break (Extremely bold idea).28 First letter between square brackets in direct quotations.26 Special Character Guideline Contradiction with WP:SP.
#Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung manual
25 Review of Manual of Style (dates and numbers).
#Red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung how to
![red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung red eagle singlebox bedienungsanleitung](https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-HxNn8XH7vXo/TXkZSq_mkTI/AAAAAAAAADg/em5WgsmxMiI/s1600/eagle2.gif)
7 Is this title correct Wikipedia:Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles)?.5 Erratum and proposal about unit conversions.